On 19.11.2017 23:19, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 19.11.2017 um 23:07 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
On 19.11.2017 22:58, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 19.11.2017 um 22:55 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
On 18.11.2017 17:58, Jacques Peron wrote:
Linux, LilyPond, LuaLaTeX (and Gregorio for gregorian chant) here.
To integrate LilyPond into LaTeX, I developped lyluatex
<https://github.com/jperon/lyluatex>.
Pardon the question: If it involves Lua, doesn’t that make it
incompatible with XeLaTeX?
Yes, hence the name ly/lua/tex ;-)
As I needn’t tell you, Urs, that’s a major drawback for users like me,
Indeed it's a drawback when a package is limited to a single LaTeX
engine. But if on the other hand this LaTeX engine provides support
for features that enable stuff in the first place there's nothing
wrong with using it, just because others can't.
or anybody who wants to use the lilyglyphs package,
lilyglyphs works with both XeLaTeX and LuaLaTeX. Initially I created
it for XeLaTeX, but Dave Bellows helped me making it compatible with
both. Quite some time ago.
or other XeLaTeX features…
For example?
Font selection, language support, UTF-8 input…
now I think more of it, I don’t actually know anything about LuaLaTeX
features, so sorry if those are all supported there as well…
Best, Simon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
