Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes: > Thank you David & Mark! > > Mark's solutions looks simpler. Any disadvantages using it comparing to > David'one?
It doesn't do what you asked for, namely setting the tempo in relation to the _current_ tempo rather than some fixed tempo. That makes it simpler because it does not need to reference the current tempo. If its operation better suits your purposes, that's fine. However, you shouldn't be mixing both approaches since Mark's solution _rounds_ the tempo (and \tempo will only accept integers, so using \tempo basically requires this), so the resulting tempo is nothing you should use as a reference for further changes. In particular, you can alternatively multiply and divide tempoWholesPerMinute by #e1.1 (an "exact" number) and arrive at the original value. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
