You are on the right track! If you Google for "lilypond beam line
break", you will quickly find the explanation and the solution:
\override Beam.breakable = ##t
/Mats
On 2017-10-26 12:10, peter.gen...@sunscales.co.uk wrote:
Is it me ?
The following script when run via Frescobaldi produces correct
notation but does not introduce a new line where expected. I ran into
this in a larger score. I have racked my brains for a reason but
cannot see any error in the data. That does not mean there isn’t one
I accept.
Can anyone spot my error or could it be an obscure bug.
\version "2.19.56"
\relative c''' {
\clef "treble"
\key e\major
\time 2/4
fis16 a[dis,] d[gis] g[cis,] c[
fis] a[dis,] c[fis] gis[d] b[
f'] gis[d] cis[g'] fis[c] b[
f'] gis[d] b[f'] fis[c] a[
dis] fis[c] b[f] e[ais] a[
dis] d[gis] g[cis] g[cis] a
}
Thanks for looking at it.
I should add that it seems to relate beams that cross bar lines in
the larger example (not include for brevity) normal service is
restored after the first bar without a beam crossing a bar line to the
first note.
The process that produces a new line is not actioned whilst a beam is
active.
--
=============================================
Mats Bengtsson, Prof.
Information Science and Engineering
School of Electrical Engineering
Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM
Sweden
Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463
Email: mats.bengts...@ee.kth.se
WWW: https://www.kth.se/profile/matben/
=============================================
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
