Bernhard Kleine <bernhard.kle...@gmx.net> writes:
> Am 23.10.2017 um 08:58 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>> I suggest you look for _structural_ differences in the respective
>> included files. How is the music organized with your Mozart, how is
>> it organized with your Bruckner? LilyPond does not mind the
>> different composers, but you obviously have a difference in what
>> constructs your repective music passages appear in.
>>
>> Are they all in a \score of their own? Do those \score constructs
>> have a \header of their own?
>>
> When adding in the piece file the header to \score it was correct.
> Before I had the header at the start of the piece file. Is there
> anything in Lilypond documentation about \header within / out of
> \score. I did not see it.
3.1.5 File structure
--------------------
A ‘.ly’ file may contain any number of toplevel expressions, where a
toplevel expression is one of the following:
[...]
• A ‘\header’ block. This sets the global (i.e., the top of file)
header block. This is the block containing the default settings of
titling fields like composer, title, etc., for all books within the
file (see *note Titles explained::).
"for all books within the file".
> BTW The Bruckner files are labeled part1_... , part2_... etc., the
> Mozart files are not.
I have no idea what "labelled" means in this context.
> What I noticed that the Bruckner pieces open in Frescobaldi with the
> master file, while the the Mozart files open single. How is this
> achieved?
Using the kind of comment you mentioned already, probably. But actual
Frescobaldi users will likely know more.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
