On 01.08.2017 22:32, Darek Cidlinský wrote:
This one slipped my attention since it's classified as an "enhancement" (I had a look in "defects" and "ugly"). Maybe the bug could be re-classified?
I agree that ‘ugly’ fits better and re-classified the issue. Best, Simon _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
