Hi Karlin, thank you for this work.
I think I have to install LilyPond on a Windows machine to do some more detailed tests that I can't direct over email. I'm pretty sure you didn't do anything wrong, so there must be some Windows issue in the code of oll-core. Urs Am 16. Juli 2017 02:20:01 MESZ schrieb Karlin High <gne...@hotmail.com>: >On 7/15/2017 5:58 PM, Urs Liska wrote: >> Now this is helpful and points me to the correct issue - which is >indeed >> an issue with oll-core. Actually this had been discussed arleady a >few >> months ago, but I don't recall if we came to a conclusion then. >> As it stands oll-core does not work properly when the main LilyPond >file >> is specified as a relative path from the same directory. At some >point >> oll-core splits the path to the input file into its segments and for >> some reason accesses the second-to-last element of this path (= the >> directory in which the compiled .ly file resides). However, if you do >> "lilypond olltest.ly" this path only has*one* element: the filename >itself. >> >> I would consider this a bug in oll-core, but as a workaround you >should >> always invoke the .ly files with their absolute path or with a >relative >> path that contains at least one directory. >> >> Best >> Urs >Unfortunately, entering full absolute files paths still gives errors >here. Two more log files attached, one with absolute path to LY file, >and another with full path to lilypond.exe as well. >-- >Karlin High >Missouri, USA
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
