On 6/6/2017 11:30 AM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > 2. Am I the only one who wants a killer part-combining framework? Is nobody > else using it as much as I am (even in its highly-limited current state)? > > 3. Are there any programmers out there willing to work with me towards a > really great partcombiner?
I use the part combiner in every project I do. Improvements to it in the 2.19 versions have been remarkable. I still have occasional struggles with it, though. Like this SSATTBB choral piece https://youtu.be/N5PWE_uHkR4 ending with different durations and lyrics in each voice. As far as helping with such a project, my experience with LilyPond amounts to only a year or so. The various Davids around here have probably forgotten more about it than I will ever learn. I can code a little, but I'm a spreadsheets-and-databases sort of person. Code related to drawing and graphics I'd probably struggle to fathom. Plus, my native coding language is Microsoft Office Visual Basic for Applications, and some C++. I know nothing at all about Scheme-family languages, other than that someday they will deplete the world's supply of parentheses. :) Perhaps a position like "documentation janitor" is something I could aspire to. -- Karlin High Missouri, USA _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
