On Wed 24 May 2017 at 22:30:46 (+0000), Karlin High wrote: > On 5/24/2017 5:19 PM, msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca wrote: > > On Wed, 24 May 2017, Simon Albrecht wrote: > >> Only if you overlook that the tagline specifically says the music was > >> _engraved_ with LilyPond, which does not tell anything about any connection > >> between LilyPond and the _content_. > >> > >> But people do overlook that, as this thread demonstrates. > > I can understand the oversight. There are lots of less-common terms that > can appear in copyright notices down near the tagline, like > "administered," "assigned," and so on. Before reading the LilyPond > essay, the term "engraved" had no meaning to me in the context of music. > Maybe it's another obscure copyright term? If I print a LilyPond > tagline, I use "Made with..." instead of "Engraved..." because my > audiences likely haven't heard of "engraving" music either. > -- > Karlin High > Missouri, USA
Perhaps this is because educators are pandering to their ignorance, thus decreasing the likelihood they'll ever encounter the term. I'm glad that LilyPond's authors know precisely what it does so well. Cheers, David. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
