Am 05.04.2017 um 08:17 schrieb Shevek: > 1) How stable is 2.19 for end users on a demanding project? It seems like > forever since 2.18, so I'm sort of surprised there hasn't been 2.20 already. > Is there some major problem I should be worried about in 2.19?
See https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/search/?q=%28_type%3ACritical+OR+labels%3ARegression%29+AND+%28status%3ANew+OR+status%3AAccepted+OR+status%3AStarted%29 for a list of critical bugs/regressions. It would be nice to have a 2.20 soon but these have to be solved before a release. I would recommend to simply try 2.19 (install 2.19, make a copy of your project, run convert-ly and lilypond on this copy), I have never had problems with 2.19 that weren’t there in 2.18. (Of course that doesn’t mean that there cannot be any problems but it seems like problems are very rare for many use cases.) > 2) What should I expect to break under 2.19? Music output changes to look > out for as I proofread? Things that might make snippets or Scheme behave > differently or not be backwards compatible? Output changes: MIDI articulation, MultiMeasureRest spacing, whiteout style. Input changes: the omission of “parser” and “location” arguments in music functions, \partial at volta repeats and time signature changes. These are only some examples. For details and other changes see http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
