> On 9 Feb 2017, at 22:29, Bernardo Barros <bernardo.bar...@nyu.edu> wrote: > > On 09/02/2017 14:59, Hans Åberg wrote: >> Multiples of 12 are straightforward, though LilyPond glyphs are >> limited. For other ETs, use Graham Breed's regular.ly. More glyphs >> can be gotten using SMuFL.org with OpenLilyPond. > > Thank you for your reply, Hans > > Yes, it looks like all the tools are already on the table. > > But no one has used regular.ly in conjunction with Bravura/SMuFL font?
Yes, I have. I use it for E53 Helmholtz-Ellis notation, which requires the Bravura font... > It indeed looks like LilyPond default font doesn't have all the > necessary glyphs. ...as you note, LilyPond doesn't have enough glyphs. > Maybe if regular.ly is included in OpenLilyLib, one could easily combine > both and implement a new extension package in OpenLilyLib for 48ET and 72ET. It was suggested to have it in LilyPond, but it did not happen. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
