> On 3 Feb 2017, at 21:51, David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> wrote: > > On Fri 03 Feb 2017 at 20:23:07 (+0100), Hans Åberg wrote: >> >> FYI, here are two versions with the repeat combined fro visual comarison. In >> the first, there is a terminating repeat sign, in the second none. > > Well, the second version (B) is just plain wrong, isn't it.
Indeed. I tried that first, but immediately went for something better. > Comparing yesterday's version (2 and 4 separate) and A (2&4 together), > I'd maintain that A describes the music more faithfully, and is > actually easier to read: when you reach 15 on the 4th-time through, > you've not only played all the measures involved, but you only have > to vault over one volta bracket, not two. It is logically wrong, because the last note, even though the same, belongs to different sections. So I decided to keep them separate. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
