On Sat 14 Jan 2017 at 10:58:58 (+0100), Simon Albrecht wrote: > On 14.01.2017 08:05, Menu Jacques wrote: > >Hello folks, > > > >In this example (from Gabrieli, faked time signature), is the > >second alternative's first measure to be numbered 3, or 2? > > I can basically think of three options: > 2 – if you don’t count repeated bars twice > 2a – to stress that it’s an alternative to bar 2 (or 2b as > alternative to 2a) > 4 – if you do count repeated bars twice > > Personally, I prefer the third option (4), since it corresponds to > the reality of the sounding music, and bar numbers better hint the > actual proportions of the piece. > I get the logic behind numbering it 3, but I still find that > confusing, since there would be no possible setting where bar ‘3’ is > played after bar ‘2’, if you get my point. > Unfortunately, LilyPond doesn’t support the third option…
I don't understand the last sentence. What's wrong with... Cheers, David.
\version "2.19.44" \relative g' { \set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible \override Score.BarNumber.break-visibility = #all-visible \time 4/2 \set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 2/2 \repeat volta 2 { g2 r8 g8 [ bes8 c8 ] d2 c2 | } \alternative { { \partial 1 d'4 d4. bes8 a4 | } { \set Score.currentBarNumber = #4 d4 d4. bes8 a4 g8 d'8 [ b8 c8 ] d2 | } } \bar "|." }
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user