On Sat 14 Jan 2017 at 10:58:58 (+0100), Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 14.01.2017 08:05, Menu Jacques wrote:
> >Hello folks,
> >
> >In this example (from Gabrieli, faked time signature), is the
> >second alternative's first measure to be numbered 3, or 2?
>
> I can basically think of three options:
> 2 – if you don’t count repeated bars twice
> 2a – to stress that it’s an alternative to bar 2 (or 2b as
> alternative to 2a)
> 4 – if you do count repeated bars twice
>
> Personally, I prefer the third option (4), since it corresponds to
> the reality of the sounding music, and bar numbers better hint the
> actual proportions of the piece.
> I get the logic behind numbering it 3, but I still find that
> confusing, since there would be no possible setting where bar ‘3’ is
> played after bar ‘2’, if you get my point.
> Unfortunately, LilyPond doesn’t support the third option…
I don't understand the last sentence. What's wrong with...
Cheers,
David.
\version "2.19.44"
\relative g' {
\set Score.barNumberVisibility = #all-bar-numbers-visible
\override Score.BarNumber.break-visibility = #all-visible
\time 4/2
\set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = 2/2
\repeat volta 2 {
g2 r8 g8 [ bes8 c8 ]
d2 c2 |
}
\alternative {
{
\partial 1
d'4 d4. bes8 a4 |
}
{
\set Score.currentBarNumber = #4
d4 d4. bes8 a4
g8 d'8 [ b8 c8 ] d2 |
}
}
\bar "|."
}
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
