On Fri 06 Jan 2017 at 13:00:32 (-0500), Joel C. Salomon wrote: > On 2017-01-05 1:04 PM, Thomas Morley wrote: > > setting spanner-id via \=... has still some shortcomings. > > > > In _this_ and only this case I'd go for a complete stencil-rewrite, > > tailored at mass (every bow starts/ends at same height. > > Nice! I can see where this has its weaknesses too: it wouldn’t work if > the two chords weren’t approximately at the same height, but it’s > perfect for this case. Thank you. > > (Now I have to make an editorial decision whether to keep this, or to > use standard LilyPond chord slurs––i.e., just one single slur curve––and > be consistent throughout the project.)
Oh, if you don't have to copy it exactly, can't you just write a tie and let LP do its own thing? Cheers, David.
\language "english"
\score {
\relative c' {
\time 3/4
<cs\=1( e!\=2( g\=3^( as\=4^(>2
<d\=1) g\=2)\=3) b\=4)>4
<cs\=1( e!\=2( g\=4^( as\=3^(>2
<d\=1) g\=2)\=3) b\=4)>4
<cs\=1( e!\=2( g~ as\=4^(>2
<d\=1) g\=2) b\=4)>4
}
\layout {}
}
slurs.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
