Am 1. Januar 2017 20:49:50 MEZ, schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > >> Am 31. Dezember 2016 08:50:51 MEZ, schrieb Noeck ><noeck.marb...@gmx.de>: >>>Hi, >>> >>>> IIRC it is officially unmaintained. >>>> Quite a pity ... >>> >>>If there is interest in maintaining it, I think the original author >>>would agree to do so. >> >> I think so too. IIRC it was just the usual lack of time. >> >>> I don't remember if there is a license with it, >>>but I can dig out the conversation with the author next week. >>> >>>IIUC, the extension is just a compressed (zip?) set of files, so the >>>required changes could be combined again in a compressed file and >>>published, once the license is clear. Such a best-effort maintenance >>>might be better than nothing. >> >> So it might be a good idea to move it to a repository (e.g. under >> https://github.com/openlilylib. >> >> I can do some "hosting" but not really maintain it. Especially as I >> don't use it personally (because LibreOffice can't include vector >> graphics (if that still is true)). > >I think that has changed years ago already, but the last time I looked, >Oolilypond did not make any use of it.
Oh, then it would definitely be worth looking into again. Being able to maintain vector quality examples in a word processor like this would be a huge selling point for getting musicologists away from MS Word. Urs -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
