ahem.... I'm sorry I wrote tie but I meant slur... I always mix up these
english term :(

Your code works. My mistake was closing the round brackets after the curly
bracket...

b \afterGrace a ({ g16 b a }) g4 g


Why this is not correct? Doesn't look 'better' then ({ g16 b a)}? I'm
joking but really, why my code is not acceptable?

Thank you, g.

On 17 November 2016 at 16:01, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:

> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> On 17 November 2016 at 15:07, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Gianmaria Lari <gianmarial...@gmail.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>> > I need to tie the first 'a' with the second 'a' that is inside some
> grace
> >>> > notes.
> >>> >
> >>> > Here it is a fragment of the code:
> >>> >
> >>> > \version "2.19.49"
> >>> > {
> >>> >   b \afterGrace a {g16 b a} g4 g
> >>> > }
> >>> >
> >>> > Any suggestion?
> >>>
> >>> Well,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> works just like that.  It just doesn't make any sense.  Are you sure
> you
> >>> want a tie here?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> David Kastrup
> >>>
> >
> > I'm far from be sure but it is just what I found:) Anyway check the
> > attached image (taken from Mary Cohen, Technique takes off, "14
> Romance").
> >
> > And thank you for your code, it works perfectly.
>
> The attached image most emphatically does _not_ use a tie but a slur.
> There is a world of difference between the two: the _tie_ would mean to
> _hold_ the a while you play g and b ending a smattering before the beat
> and only then release the a after its tied part has ended.  It would be
> very strange to write it like this, however.
>
> A slur means to run notes into another.  A tie means to have only one
> note in the first place (so you can only tie equal pitches).  A slur on
> equal pitches, when executed on the piano, would usually be played with
> alternating fingers with the second striking before the first has
> completely left the key.  A tie just means to do nothing and hold the
> note for the added duration of the tied notes.
>
> So you probably wanted
>
>
>
> and that still works without a hitch and is even simpler.  So where was
> the actual problem?
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to