Hello McLaren, As a newbie to this kind of calculations in notes length, how I am supposed to play them? In particular, if others play them too?
JM > Le 8 nov. 2016 à 09:02, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> a écrit : > > mclaren <metachroma...@gmail.com> writes: > >> An alternative method involves simply adding in the required rests, rather >> than squishing or stretching the entire measure with a large tuplet. Since >> this method is easy to calculate exactly because you're just adding and >> subtracting various integer fractions, it always produces guaranteed >> results. With very large tuplets, there seem to sometimes be floating point >> inaccuracies in the calculations done inside Lilypond, > > LilyPond does not work with floating point or other inaccurate types for > musical length calculations. Its own rationals (where it uses them > rather than Guile's rather large rationals) however are limited in the > maximum value of numerator and denominator. I don't think that it > checks all cases for overflow, so when you exceed their sizes, results > will not be inaccurate as much as completely off the wall. > > -- > David Kastrup > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
