Flaming Hakama by Elaine <ela...@flaminghakama.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:35 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> Flaming Hakama by Elaine <ela...@flaminghakama.com> writes: >> >> > I'm not sure if this is a language problem, or an attitude problem. >> > Because it seems like you are coming to the opposite interpretation of >> what >> > I say, despite me being very detailed in my explanation. >> > >> > >> > Let's start with the main point: >> > >> > THE VERTICAL ORDER OF NOTES ON THE PAGE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORDER >> OF >> > THE VOICES WITHIN THE << // // // >> CONSTRUCT, OR WHAT THE VOICE NAMES >> ARE >> > CALLED >> > >> > Do you agree with that? You should, since it is true. >> >> No, I don't agree with it. > > > Then you are being obstinate. > > A statement of fact, and you don't agree with it.
It's _only_ statements of fact that one can sensibly agree or disagree with, so that's not particularly egregious. > What are we to do with such childish behavior? > > > >> If you cannot distinguish "high correlation >> though not 100%" from "no correlation", I don't see a point in >> continuing. There you have your answer to "what to do with such childish behavior". -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
