On 10/29/16 3:29 AM, "Chris Yate" <chrisy...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 29 Oct 2016 04:39, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote: >> >> I have worked some more on the augmentation dot algorithms, including >>adding the directions (/DotsUp, /DotsDown). >> >> I would like your opinion on whether the attached regression test, >>which is different from the current development regression tests, is >>correct. I think it is, but I'd like your opinions. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Carl >This specific multiphonic case? I think it is ok. But is there an >argument for adding some horizontal space...? > >What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than stacked >notes? E.g. << <f a b c>4. // <a e,>2. >> (untested). > >I think from previous test cases it may become difficult to understand >which dots behind to which notes. IIRC there's an outstanding bug about >horizontal positioning in this situation. I have searched the issue tracker for all open issues with dot in the title. I haven't found any bug report looking for changes in horizontal positioning. If you can find it, I'll be happy to look into it, even though I don't think it's part of this same issue. Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
