Hi everyone, I've never used implicit voice assignment and I doubt I will start with it now.
But since there's no real need for the ordering of voices _in the code_ to match the vertical arrangement of the _engraved_ notes (and isn't that also, what Lilypond is all about? You specify the input in a well-structured way, let lily care about the engraving) I'd find any input sequence other than 1/2/3/... counterintuitive. Best, Robert ______ It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. -- William Kingdon Clifford > On 27 Oct 2016, at 13:40, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > > This concerns << ... \\ ... \\ ... ... >> > > If we have more than one voice, voices are assigned in order: > > 1/2, 1/2/3, 1/2/3/4, 1/2/3/4/5, 1/2/3/4/5/6 ... > > while the documentation is quite explicit that, ordered from top to > bottom, assignments should be more like > > 1/2, 3/1/2, 3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4, 5/3/1/2/4/6 ... > > namely keeping the small voice numbers for the inner voices. Now I am > sort of afraid that changing this is likely to end pretty disruptive to > existing scores. Even though I don't know how many really use the > original ordering unchanged as well as intentionally. > > Thoughts? > > -- > David Kastrup > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
