Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > 2016-10-21 22:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com>: >> 2016-10-21 21:55 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > >>> Different version number? Or missing support at compilation time? What >>> does >>> >>> ldd <path to LilyPond> >>> >>> state here? >>> >>> On my self-compiled LilyPond I see >>> >>> dak@lola:/usr/local/tmp/lilypond$ ldd out/bin/lilypond > [...] >> >>> What's the set of libraries in the precompiled binary? >>> >>> -- >>> David Kastrup >> >> For 2.18.2 I get: >> > [...] >> For self-compiled 2.19.50 I get: > [...] > > Hard to read, thus same attached.
It's probably sort of a red herring since the readline library is in neither version. Probably it depends on whether the readline development headers were available (in a version matching the installed libreadline on the target system) at the time Gub compiled libguile. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
