On 17 October 2016 at 13:00, Javier Ruiz-Alma <jav...@ruiz-alma.com> wrote: > > The concern with fixing the first segment via \shape is the correction would > be useful when the slur is broken, but undesirable when not. We typeset the > same source with different paper sizes, so there's a real chance fix, or no > fix, one of the versions will show an undesirable slur shape. Forcing or > preventing a system break is non-ideal either. >
The second set of control points in \shape has to do double duty depending on whether it is at the end of the slur or at a line break. Perhaps more useful would be \shape taking the first point of the first group and the last point of the last group if the slur is not broken. <wishfulthinking>Even better would be the ability to apply a totally different set of points depending on the line breaking. This would be trickier as a slur spanning three bars could potentially break in two different places.</wishfulthinking> It would potentially make things quite complicated. Vaughan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
