David Nalesnik wrote Wednesday, September 14, 2016 1:33 AM Subject: Re: BendSpanner-engraver
> Hi Harm, > > This looks marvelous! I know nothing about the notation, but the demo > file is simply beautiful to behold. > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> 2016-09-11 20:38 GMT+02:00 Trevor Daniels <t.dani...@treda.co.uk>: >>> Hi Harm >>> >>> I'm not a fretted-string player, but this looks very impressive! This will >>> be a tremendous addition to LP! >>> >>> Trevor >> >> Hi Trevor, >> >> currently the whole thing is more at pre-pre-alpha state ;) >> Though, with David Nalesniks MeasureCounter we have at least one other >> grob defined entirely in scheme, iirc. > > It is. > >> This encourages me :) >> > > It would be simple enough to move the bits into the various files. > This will be very satisfying in the case of bend-grob-defs.ly! > > One drawback, of course, is the issue of automatic documentation. > There will be information in the IR (grob, interface, event), but the > engraver won't be represented. Could we not simply add a dummy .cc engraver which simply calls the ADD_TRANSLATOR macro? Maybe just one could document all Scheme engravers with several such calls. Worth a try? Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
