"Mark Stephen Mrotek" <carsonm...@ca.rr.com> writes: > David, > > And it would have been "visible" if the file I attached had been viewed > rather than dismissed as not being "minimal." Reminds me Aesop fable of the > Fox and the Grapes.
I don't understand what you are trying to say here. The symptoms of the grace synchronization problem are the same as that of putting isolated staff-creating elements into <<...>> so viewing the resulting PDF file would not have made the actual problem visible. And due to the non-minimality of the examples, ruling out the acciaccature as the cause of the problem did require an experienced user, namely Thomas Morley, to reduce the example to a minimal one in order to figure out the root cause and exclude the acciaccature as contributing to the problem. Yes, in hindsight it would have been possible to spot the problem even in the unabridged file since it clearly was present in there. Unfortunately, hindsight is not available before arriving at the correct conclusion. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
