Am 06.08.2016 um 17:11 schrieb Pierre Perol-Schneider:
Plus pdf
2016-08-06 17:10 GMT+02:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com>:
Logo test enclosed.
Cheers,
Pierre
My opinions:
- #5 is much better than both #3 and #2 (and #1) because it’s more
realistic (no overlapping pads, having a gap) and less black. But not
100% convincing either (especially the pad).
- #4 is very dark and an even number of petals per layer looks weird
(cannot say why, of course five per layer isn’t realistic either)
- I like the flower of #6 (but not it’s outline version #7) but I think
it would need a better matching (more realistic) pad. This pad matches
well with it’s original flower from your first proposal :)
- #8 of course would need a pad to recognise it as a water lily rather
than a generic flower; this was just a test to demonstrate a more
realistic (?) positioning of petals, not a complete logo. Maybe I’ll try
to add a pad.
- #9 has a similar problem as #6: the styles of the flower (very static)
and the pad (a little bit more vivid) don’t really match IMHO
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
