On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:01:26 +0200 Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de> wrote:
> But maybe less is more and two flower layers are enough; so here is a > combination of logo3 and logo4 (only two flower layers -> less detail, > only one pad but with gap -> more typical). Yes, simplicity is better. However, this looses the typical 'lotus' appearance of a waterlily. See e.g. https://www.iconfinder.com/icons/566749/flora_flower_flowers_green_lily_plant_water-lily_icon http://www.freepik.com/free-icon/lotus_864201.htm http://www.shutterstock.com/pic-150336194/stock-vector-lotus-symbol.html -- Johan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user