Am 03.08.2016 um 18:07 schrieb Pierre-Luc Gauthier:
2016-08-03 11:03 GMT-04:00 Andrew Bernard <andrew.bern...@gmail.com>:
The concept is fine I am sure, but the execution difficult, and acceptance
problematical.
I know it’s difficult but does that mean one cannot try?
Logo design is fraught with difficulty, and you will inevitably end up with
something half the population does not like.
I think that might be realistic but not problematic. If someone doesn’t
like the logo, they don’t have to use it; of course it would be nice to
have something that is at least acceptable for most people.
And this argument works also for the current logo (an image of a
waterlily flower, two leaves, and a score in the background): It’s a
nice picture, but I don’t like it as a logo because it cannot be used in
print (at least in small sizes).
I agree,
but since there already *is* a logo,
wouldn't it be acceptable to "simply" make it a b/w vectorialised
version of it?
That would be nice but I doubt one can make a convincing b/w version of
that. Even if you leave out the background it’s a very complex image.
And even if you manage to make a b/w version of that it’s not usable at
small sizes.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
