Am 3. August 2016 12:34:28 MESZ, schrieb Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca>: >Hi Harm, > >On Aug 3, 2016, at 1:05 AM, Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> >wrote: >> Regarding scheme, there is no difference. > >So > >(1) the leading hash (which your example has and mine doesn’t) makes no >difference;
The hash switches from LilyPond to Scheme parsing. Concretely it tells the LilyPond parser to pass over to Guile and ask that to parse *one* complete Schene expression. When already in Scheme mode such hash signs usually trigger an "unexpected event" (or so). >and >(2) the functions ‘define' and 'define-public' are identical They are identical when used in LilyPond files. They maje a difference within Scheme *modules* HTH Urs > >? > >Perhaps learning Scheme is going to be even more confusing than I >feared… =( > >Thanks, >Kieren. >________________________________ > >Kieren MacMillan, composer >‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info >‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info > > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-user mailing list >lilypond-user@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
