Stephen MacNeil <classicalja...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi David > > I notice both > > <c e>^(_(d) > > > and > > <c e>^(_(d)) > > > work. The last with )) > > > is one way "more" correct?
Slurs don't nest. The current implementation does not complain about spurious slur starts/ends. It's only when the directions on slur starts are straightforwardly incompatible that it sets double slurs (which allows you to tweak the slurs from double slurs independently). So pick the version you like better. 2.14 or so is a bit unpredictable in its complaints (and will typeset only one slur anyway). There is ongoing work for allowing multiple parallel spanners in other ways. I don't know whether this will change this behavior. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
