Putting it on the list (my mistake leaving it off earlier). On 4/29/16 7:27 AM, "Carl Sorensen" <c_soren...@byu.edu> wrote:
>On 4/29/16 5:58 AM, "Matt Hood" <mattho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>I¹ve got a non-technical question regarding mode of pitch input. What >>does everyone prefer? Relative, absolute, or a mix of both? > >About a year ago, Kieren indicated that he has decided to go completely >absolute mode, even to the point >of redoing his historic code: > >https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-04/msg00846.html > > >I find his arguments interesting. And if I were engraving things as >complex as his, I might also move to absolute. > >But I am working on simple, short, pieces. The longest I have done to >this point is about 8 pages. >For my use case, the convenience of less typing (and to be fair, not >having to worry about the octave >I'm using) overrides the inconvenience of the occasional octave mistake. > >So I use relative. > >Thanks, > >Carl > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
