Hi Abraham,

I sympathise with your employment redundancy and the issues it creates, and 
understand this as a rationale for you re-licensing your fonts under a 
commercial licence. While there is nothing wrong with that, I wonder if you 
have done your market research on this? How many people are likely to buy your 
fonts in absolute terms? It is hard to imagine that there will be large 
numbers, hence this project may only generate a small trickle of cash flow. And 
already it seems to be somewhat alienating the open source users, as judged by 
the activity of this thread.

As a committed open source proponent, and long term user of Linux, I do not use 
proprietary software on my Linux systems, as a matter of principle (see the 
Debian philosophy for more details). So even if proprietary lilypond fonts came 
along, I would not purchase them in any case. There are many hundreds of 
thousands of Linux users who share the same viewpoint – take a look at the 
numbers of downloads of Debian. Some people may not be so strict, but this 
should enter into your considerations.

So perhaps your market is FInale and Sibelius users instead, or Windows 
lilypond users. Again, I wonder if the demand is there to make it commercially 
viable?

Many highly regarded typographers producing fonts that can take up to five 
years or more of difficult labour to perfect often find difficulty making an 
income from sales of even the finest fonts, unless the typeface acquires a 
certain popularity with designers or cult status, but this is not the norm. To 
overcome this, many designers will now offer several faces of a family for 
free. Given that Finale and Sibelius come with fonts out of the box that most 
users seem satisfied with (indeed most users who are satisfied with FInale and 
Sibelius output do not seem to me to be very discriminating about fine 
engraving… [sorry!]) again I wonder where your actual market may lie? Given 
that music fonts are a very highly micro-specialised niche area compared to 
text fonts, it seems problematic to me.

Just some thoughts. Not meaning to sound negative, but rather, adding some 
realism.

Having said that, allow me to publicly praise and thank you for your 
outstanding work on your very fine fonts, full of subtlety and nuance, and 
making them available for use in lilypond.

Andrew


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to