2016-02-18 23:31 GMT+01:00 tisimst <tisimst.lilyp...@gmail.com>: > > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:26 PM, Kieren MacMillan [via Lilypond] <[hidden > email]> wrote: >> >> Hi Harm, >> >> > A hacky solution for one-time use >> >> This is great! The only thing I could suggest is that the font for the bar >> numbers shouldn’t be the same as the big MMR number font. > > > Yes, very nice! I've been trying to do this for a little while now, but this > lays some excellent ground-work. > >> >> > A cleaner one would likely need an engraver. >> >> I see this kind of numbering a fair bit in musical theatre scores. I don’t >> know if it’s common elsewhere, but it might be a nice feature in the >> Lilypond toolkit. > > > Thomas, is there a permanent form for \applyOutput? That way you don't need > to do this every time you want to use it? > > Best, > Abraham
I'm a little surprised about the positive echo about my little coding. For me it was more a coding-exercise to get myself more familiar with \applyOutput. (David K recently demonstrated it's usage.) I've never seen this kind of annotations myself. As said before, a cleaner and switched-on/off-on-demand-coding requires an engraver, as far as I can see now. Although a more permanent form may likely be achieved by mapping the function over some music, I think an engraver would be preferable. I'll try to give it a go the upcoming days. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user