Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > Though I'm not sure with the following one. May I ask: curried or not? > (define (foo a b) > (let ((x2 (lambda (arg) (* 2 arg)))) > (map x2 (list a b))))
Why would that one be curried? It's completely boring, returns a list, and its internal function x2 is totally straightforward (not even a closure) and is invisible to the caller. Slightly more interesting is (define (fie a) (lambda (x) (+ x a))) which is equivalent to the curried definition (define ((fie a) x) (+ x a)) However, the currying is not a feature of the semantics (the semantics of returning a function or more often a closure, namely a function with an environment in the form of variables imported into its scope) but of the syntax. So while the second definition of fie is a curried definition, the first equivalent definition isn't. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
