Hi all, musicus wrote: > +1 for the edition-engraver,
=) > but it's not possible to reflect the actual structure of connected dynamics… Oh, I agree: Just as there are \noBreak, \noBeam, etc., there should be general \connect and \split options "between” arbitrary grobs. I just have no idea what I’m talking about when I say that kind of thing. ;) > I imagine a way of positioning objects relative to any other object. > (this feature could be a nice workaround solution for most positioning bugs) Yes! Without breaking a sweat, I could probably list thirty “grob-pairings” that would benefit from this. Right off the bat, it would be great to “link” a RehearsalMark with a MetronomeMark at the same moment; currently, I have to [edition-]adjust the extra-spacing-width of one or both *and* the X- or Y-offset(s) [or both]. David wrote: > LilyPond already positions all of its objects relative to other objects. Well, yes… But (as far as I know) there is no “hard-link” between most grobs, analogous to the one between a Hairpin and the [immediately] following DynamicText. Happy to be proven wrong, though! Thanks, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
