On 06.12.2015 15:31, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Hello,
I would like to have a custom accidental style acting like manuscripts
and first editions of Seb. Bach do:
and, in fact, was common at the time. I think the assumption of our docs
that the default style were corresponding to 18th century usage rather
refers to 19th/20th century editions of 18th century music.
– do not remember accidentals*
– unless a pitch is immediately repeated
– or with chromatic steps: an accidental should always be printed if
the previous note has the same pitch, but a different alteration.
To be more precise: the same _step_, but a different alteration.
I find the mechanism for defining accidental styles difficult (see
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2014-02/msg00250.html>);
can anyone help with this? It might be a modification of 'forget.
Yours, Simon
* except of course those in the key signature
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
