arg… Here’s the snippet:
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19"
\language "english"
examples = {
\tuplet 5/4 { c''32[ 32 64 64 32 32] }
\tuplet 5/4 { e'''32[ 32 64 g64 32 32] }
}
\score {
\examples
}
%%% SNIPPET ENDS
On Dec 1, 2015, at 10:34 AM, Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
> Hi Gilberto,
>
>> I would need one of those automagical ways
>
> Even if you weren’t dealing with algorithmic music, an automagic way would be
> much better…
>
>> What surprises me about the default look is how confusing it actually is!
>
> True! If you look at the following [even simpler] snippet, it’s clear that
> things are fine when un-kneed, but go wonky when kneed. It looks like the
> algorithm says “keep all beams at their highest possible position” instead of
> [what you want, which is:] “beam the 32nds together across the whole group,
> and then add the 64th beam(s) where most appropriate”.
>
> I’m in no way certain (a) what the current algorithm actually is/does, and
> (b) whether improving it is possible/reasonable/feasible. I’m just “+1”-ing
> you here, having noticed this for the first time because of your post.
>
> Here’s hoping you find a good solution!
> Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
