Hi again, On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:44 AM, David Nalesnik <david.nales...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Gilberto, > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Gilberto Agostinho < > gilbertohasn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am trying to improve the slashed grace function because currently it >> does >> work only for a limited amount of examples. I am trying to make the slash >> always at the same position relative to the highest beam (which was one of >> the most annoying things about the other function) and then take into >> account the beam angle to compensate for the slash angle. My solution is >> surely very inelegant (regarding programming) so I'd welcome anyone who >> wants to improve it, but it does a much better job in practise. Compare it >> below. >> >> BEFORE: >> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n184292/04.png> >> >> AFTER: >> <http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n184292/19.png> >> >> Here is the function: slashed-notes-function.ly >> < >> http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n184292/slashed-notes-function.ly >> > >> >> Cheers, >> Gilberto >> >> > Could you provide a link to the function you're trying to improve? It > isn't part of the regular distribution. > > I suppose it's this: http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user%40gnu.org/msg86544.html What confuses me a little here is your usage of the stem-fraction parameter. This is designed in the original to represent where the slash crosses the initial stem as a fraction of the stem's length. From visual inspection, it appears that you have it set to halfway along the stem in the original in every case. The idea--surely not ideal--is that it would need to be adjusted on a case-by-case basis. It appears to have a different function in your example. --David
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
