Hi Joram, Thanks for the helpful response!
> I was interested in a direct comparison to the current style. That's why > I created the attachment from your testing code. > red = Lilypond's default style > black = your Brandt-Roemer style > green = differences I noticed (only once) Very nice — thanks for doing that. > My personal take is: nice and understandable. I like the sizes of > accidentals and the consistent font size for numbers. Excellent. I would like to implement kerning, if possible. Otherwise, I felt like I had found good basic sizes, relations, and spacing — glad to hear you agree! > Two questions: > 1. Why is Cm69 (ly) = C6/9 (BR)? Where is the "MI" gone? Is it kind of > implied? I don't see it. ERROR! =) Thanks for catching that; I will fix it immediately. > 2. (I almost don't dare to ask, but) in your code, could the "MI" for > minor be configurable such that the BR style can be used but with 'm' > for minor? (For ignorants who want to break with a standard.) Once a complete B&R example is done, I will be seeing how many of the elements can be parameterized. Certainly, the minor indicator would be one (and one of the easier ones, at that). Stay tuned. > Thanks for your work in any case! My pleasure. Thanks for the feedback. Best, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
