Hi Jan-Peter
Am 19.11.2015 um 10:16 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
> Hi Urs,
>
> I don't have a solution, but a hint:
> in 2.18.2 stable, the beaming is correct - maybe its a bug in 2.19.x?
Thank you for that hint, which is indeed valuable.
This is quite likely a side-effect of the fix for #4355 that explicitly
changed the behaviour of the subdivisions (upon my request BTW).
In that perspective the current behaviour is actually consistent
(although undesirable IMO): Subdividing beams should respect the length
of the previous and following groups. In my example this is a quarter
note -> no beam.
I've written a feature request/bug report to bug-lilypond.
Urs
>
> Cheers,
> Jan-Peter
>
> Am 19.11.2015 um 09:42 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a problem getting a beam subdivision right, and I can't seem to
>> find a solution in the manual:
>>
>> I have this group of 16th notes:
>>
>> \relative b {
>> \time 6/4
>> b16 [ d b' g d g d' b g b g' d ] r2.
>> }
>>
>> and I want to have the secondary beam divided in three parts with one
>> quarter note each.
>>
>> However
>> \set subdivideBeams = ##t
>>
>> breaks the beam in three groups altogether, and no combination of
>> baseMoment and beatStructure I could think of produced the expected
>> result.
>>
>> Any suggestion?
>>
>> TIA
>> Urs
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> lilypond-user@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> lilypond-user@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
