Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: > On 04.11.2015 19:24, David Kastrup wrote: >> Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: >> >>> This compiles fine inasmuch as the output is just as intended, but it >>> does sport a: >>> >>> <0>"/home/simon/lilypond/tests/wrap-multiple-books.ly:17:1: error: bad >>> expression type >>> >>> \printParts one.two" >>> >>> Is this worth a bug report about this error appearing too easily? >> No. You use map instead of for-each, > > How would I use for-each here? I’m not familiar with that.
for-each has exactly the same arguments as map but does not return a value. >> you use define-scheme-function instead of define-void-function. > > Ah, I see. I wouldn’t have thought that a function which basically > runs print-book-with-default would classify as a void function. What do you consider "void" then? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
