David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk> writes: > Quoting Thomas Morley (thomasmorle...@gmail.com): >> 2015-10-13 3:18 GMT+02:00 David Wright <lily...@lionunicorn.co.uk>: >> > Quoting s.p.korzil...@gmail.com (s.p.korzil...@gmail.com): >> > >> >> I’m trying to write a piece that has repeats with >> >> alternatives. It seems that “ >> >> \repeat volta 2” is the way to go with supplying the alternatives in “\ >> >> alternative”. However, this seems to work only for alternative >> >> endings, while I >> >> have alternative middle parts. >> > >> > Hi again, thanks to >> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-10/msg00399.html >> > I can now close the volta bracket with this undocumented feature, >> > \allowVoltaHook, thus avoiding inkscape postprocessing. >> > >> > Be aware, however, that \allowVoltaHook is global and unresettable, >> > at least at the level of \score. (I don't use \book myself.) >> >> Apart from being listed in available music-functions there is indeed >> no documentation for `allowVoltaHook' and it is indeed global and >> unresettable. > > Yes; I'm not sure what the function was written for, if using it in > the way I did is "appalling".
Oh, "appalling" was my choice of words and I employed it for how \allowVoltaHook is defined, not for how you used it. > This seems to work well. I noticed that define-bar-line was the only > other occurrence of [void] - bar (string) in the Notation manual, but > that meant nothing to me. Now I have another target to think about: > how music functions work. Basically like macros. They transform some input into a music expression that is then included instead of the original input. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
