2015-09-20 14:38 GMT+02:00 BB <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net>:
> Have fun with testing!
>
> \version "2.19.25"
>
> #(set-global-staff-size 30)
>
> chordtest = \chordmode {
>
> c:sus %power chord Lilypond calls it wrong as C
>
> c:sus3 % power chord Lilypond calls it correctly as C
>
> c:sus5 %power chord Lilypond calls it wrong as C
>
> c:1.4.5 % equal to:
>
> c:sus4
>
> c:1.5.2 % equal to:
>
> c:sus2
>
> c:sus3 % normal c major chord Lilypond calls it correctly as C
>
> c:5.3 % normal c major chord Lilypond calls it correctly as C
>
> c:5.3+ % normal c major chord Lilypond calls it correctly as C,
>
> %3+ is written as e#
>
> c:sus6
>
> c:sus7
>
> :sus
>
> c:7sus
>
> c:7
>
> c:3.5.30
>
> c:5.30
>
> c:m30
>
> c:m
>
> c:min
>
> c^3
>
> c:5
>
> }
>
> << \context ChordNames \chordtest
>
> \context Voice \chordtest
>
>>>No clue what you want to tell me. I suggest you write your own 'construct-chord-elements' I'm going to fix my OS now. It's no unlikely I break it completely at first attempt. Then you have to -- or be happy with whatever you get. > > > > On 20.09.2015 14:31, Thomas Morley wrote: > > 2015-09-20 14:14 GMT+02:00 BB <bb-543...@telecolumbus.net>: > > I absolutely agree! I did not understand as I read that Lilypond now > supports misbehavour of some lazy people with reduced harmonic skills. > > There are a bunch of "coloured" sus chords, not just sus4 for every sus > sign. > > No idea if anyone tested my recent proposal, seems not. > > From the user's point of view it simply aliases > c:sus to c:sus4 > and > c:5 to c:1.5 or c^3 > > no other sus is changed or impossible to use, c:5 will only work if > the 5 is the one and only modifier, hence no other stuff is concerned. > If it turns out that my low tested proposal doesn't warrant this, it > needs more work, ofc. > > Though, I really don't understand why people don't test and give feedback. > Instead more and more mails cumulate. > > -Harm > > P.S. > David announced an own patch. I'm quite confident he will do better > work than me. > > On 20.09.2015 13:38, Johan Vromans wrote: > > So what is the big deal to write c:sus4 when you want to designate your > flavour of Csus? > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
