With Cm^sus4 for <c es f g> I have some problems. 4 of cm is f - is it?
But it is not suspended but f is added for the suspended f? Does that
make sense?
<c es f g> I would call (always depending on the context) Cmadd4,
F7sus2/C, D#6no5add2/C.
But C^sus4♭3 <for <c es f g> is not necessarily wrong (in my oppinion),
as 3 (=e) is suspended and set f instead. b3 will be added -> b3 = es.
Always consider the harmonic context!!!
Am 17.09.2015 21:24, schrieb Malte Meyn:
Am 17.09.2015 um 20:17 schrieb Noeck:
I’ve seen that once in Cm^sus4 for <c es f g> but it doesn’t make
sense to me; I would prefer Cm^add4 (or perhaps Cm^add11). LilyPond
prints <c es f g> as C^sus4♭3.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
