On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:04:24 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
Gilles <gil...@harfang.homelinux.org> writes:
Hello.
On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:49:04 +0200, BB wrote:
I just read
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/learning/entering-input.html
(again). I find that is a good basis for such an introduction,
IIRC, someone (among the most prominent current or past developers)
once stated that this first example being compilable by lilypond had
been a big mistake.
Well, I think it should specify a note duration for the first note.
Other than that, I find nothing wrong with it.
Perhaps it was meant to show people that text input is not scary.
But its simplicity is deceitful: no actual score is that simple;
even
a monophonic instrument part should not be encoded that way.
Hacking down some melody tends to be rather similar to that. Many
tunes
in abc format look pretty much like that and transfer reasonably well
to
LilyPond input of that complexity.
Would someone switch to lilypond just for this kind of work?
I did not to argue in that direction (lesser complex scores), but even
so:
where is the title of the tune? ;-)
Gilles
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
