David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> I’m sorry I have to come again with a question concerning shapeII, and >>> with a not very tiny example. >>> Please have a look at the attachment: >>> – The slur _before_ the revert (be it through \revert or synonymously >>> through \tweak) is oddly displaced. >>> – Using \shapeII (I think only the override-like form is affected) >>> thoroughly confuses staff-staff-spacing, shifting the lower staff into >>> the system below. >>> >>> I don’t quite know where to search… >> >> I suspect the same problem that has been plaguing \offset until >> >> commit 610d3aa70a430b620b7175fbe264a9f21eba4482 >> Author: David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> >> Date: Wed Jul 22 13:58:18 2015 +0200 >> >> Issue 4516: Make \offset handle unpure/pure containers >> >> I suspect that the \shape command in LilyPond as well as \shapeII >> outside of LilyPond would require use of the technique employed in that >> commit. > > Maybe one should refactor that code so that all of the trickery is > encapsuled into one generic function, and the particular manipulation to > do is passed as one argument to that function. That way, one could > reuse all of the trickery for other manipulations.
I'm currently doing that and will likely use it in \shape if it's obvious how to do that. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
