On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Urs Liska [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n179126...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
>
>
> Am 28.07.2015 um 15:06 schrieb Ralf Mattes:
>
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 28. Juli 2015 13:58 CEST, Wols Lists <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=179126&i=0>> schrieb:
> >
> >
> >> Don't know whether it would work for lily, but on my system (gentoo
> >> linux) I just copied all my Windows fonts into a "Windows" directory I
> >> created under /usr/share/fonts.
> > No, this is ba advice: anything under /usr/ is owned and managed by the
> system/vendor
> > (on linux most likely by the system's package manager). The system is
> free to (and often will)
> > remove/overwrite these files.
> > User/Admin installs should be put into the /usr/local/ subtree.
> > So, to install custom fonts for all users of the system, copy them into
> > /usr/local/share/fonts.
> > On systems using fontconfig (pretty much all distros by now) you can
> also place the fonts
> > in the ~/.fonts directory.
> > To see a list of all fonts available to fontconfig run:
> > fc-list
> > This will also show the path where a font was found (sometimes usefull
> when a font
> > is installed in more than one version).
> >
> >> One reboot later, all those windows fonts were available to my linux
> >> programs.
> > You never need to reboot linux to update the font information!
> > If the newly installed font really doesn't show up with fc-list (it
> should) you
> > can run 'fc-cache -f -v'
> >
> > Cheers. Ralf Mattes
>
> Apart from Ralf's comments LilyPond doesn't (yet) find fonts in the
> system's font directories but only in its own font directory. So for now
> one can only install additional fonts within the Lily installation.
> To alleviate the problems you can use the mentioned script that a) only
> places links in the folders and b) can easily reapply the "installation
> process".
>
That's right. It doesn't include the system font folder by default, but
I've had great success doing it the way Ralf, et al, suggested by including
it (or any other folder that contains font files) in LilyPond's include
path, therefore bypassing multiple font installations (as you can see
below, I have many). This is ridiculously easy in Frescobaldi (Edit >
Preferences), of course. Here's a screenshot on my Windows machine of
what's required there for anyone wanting to try it out:
[image: Inline image 1]
I haven't had any issues with doing it this way. I was planning on showing
these instructions on the font website documentation page. Can anyone else
who has used the new fonts concur with my findings on other OSs? I've heard
that this works on Mac OSX, but some current testimonials would be
reassuring.
- Abraham
image.png (160K)
<http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/attachment/179128/0/image.png>
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Font-search-path-Linux-tp179121p179128.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
