I was thinking about it and I think the problem is general with
dynamics. I suppose they shouldn't start and end where they do now. They
start too late and end too soon. The latter is more important. Some
hand-engraved score could help deciding this. Generally I feel that the
< and > mark should include the noteheads they belong to.
Bert
Erik Sandberg wrote:
On Tuesday 24 August 2004 22.01, Bertalan Fodor wrote:
I would like to lengthen the dynamics hairpin in this case:
d16\> dis\!
Setting minimum-length is not good, because it makes bigger space
between the two notes.
The problem is essentially that the end of the decrescendo is always
attached to the left side of the note and not the right side (which
would be better in this case).
What is the solution?
Thanks,
Bert
You can probably do something like this (ugly & untested):
<<{d16 dis} {s16..\> s64\!}>>
or even better
<<{d16 dis} {\hideNotes d16..\> dis64\!}>>
though the latter may suffer from a bug.
Erik
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
