Thank you for your speedy reply and candor. I appreciate this, as now I can look forward to seeing improvements with an already stellar program and tinker with the "moment" at the same time! Thanks again!
IC, Josh On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 5:26 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > > > Joshua Nichols <josh.d.nich...@gmail.com> writes: > > > >> I absolutely sent the wrong example. This is my work around for right > now, > >> here below, and re-attached, is the example I'm having trouble with. > > > > Ok, here's the deal: percent repeats don't work with changed time > > signatures. The problem is that a change in time signature is effected > > by a context property change while typesetting, and the percent repeat > > _iterator_ starts making decisions at the time it encounters the \repeat > > percent which is earlier. > > > > That's stupid. It's also the same problem as issue 3693 > > <URL:https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3693>. > > It turns out that emulating the broken part is somewhat feasible. > > > { > \time 5/16 a16\<[ r c-> r a] > \time 4/16 c16->\! r r8 \mark \markup { \box 191 } > } > \omit\time 9/32 > #(make-music 'DoublePercentEvent > 'length (ly:make-moment 9/16)) > #(make-music 'DoublePercentEvent > 'length (ly:make-moment 9/16)) > > There is a whole bunch wrong with that. But the graphical output in > _this_ staff (others will likely need to have the time signature made > invisible as well) seems to be more or less what you want. Maybe one > can play around in order to make the input correspond a bit better with > the logic. > > -- > David Kastrup >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
