Hi Urs, My desktop is a gentoo system which builds directly from the git repository (gentoo has something like a "live" package, with a version number -9999 at the end, that pulls from the live branch). On my sytem, that returns a lily version of 2.19.22. My laptop, however, is an ubuntu system (never managed to get gentoo working on it, alas!), for which I have 2.19.21 installed from the .sh file available on the website.
So, it's probably the case that whatever the issue is will come up again when I get home. If it's any help, a lot of my system fonts now appear much sharper (say, in the file manager, or Firefox), which I suspect has to do with a recent update to one of the base packages. I'll let you know when I get home. Thanks for the help. A On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> wrote: > > > Am 27.06.2015 um 11:04 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh: > > Well, I've now loaded this up on my laptop, and re-cloned the > > openlilylib directory, and now the problem no longer appears. I have > > other issues -- namely that my production box is running lilypond > > 2.19.22, which I can't seem to install from ubuntu -- but those are > minor. > > 2.19.22 isn't released yet AFAICS. Do you have a custom built LilyPond? > > > > > Urs, did you update something on the git tree, or was this simply a > > problem on my side that I'll run into again when I get back home? > > It's not clear what you say. Do you have a laptop with something < > 2.19.22 and a home pc with a custom build from the 2.19.22 line? > > If that's the case then probably you'll experience the problem at home > again because the changes in LilyPond have been introduced there. > > I assume I'll have to change the implementation (and look for other > parts where this might matter) and introduce a version switch so the > code executed from openLilyLib depends on the LilyPond version. > > I'm approaching the state to be able to work properly again. > Unfortunately I have to pick up a presentation for upcoming Wednesday. > Anyone in or near Karlsruhe BTW? > > Urs > > > > > Cheers, > > > > A > > > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:05 AM, Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org > > <mailto:u...@openlilylib.org>> wrote: > > > > > > > > Am 26.06.2015 um 23:50 schrieb David Kastrup: > > > Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org <mailto:u...@openlilylib.org>> writes: > > > > > >> Oh, I didn't realize this might be for me... > > >> I'll try to look into it ASAP. But at the moment I don't have a > > >> working LilyPond at hand. > > >> > > >> I have some ideas, though. Maybe openlilylib has to be adapted to > a > > >> recent LilyPond improvement. > > > > > > Well, it's probably most reliable if your installation instructions > > > and/or scripts include a run of convert-ly. Otherwise, there will > be > > > unhappy people with either variant for a long time. > > > > I think in the case of openLilyLib I will manually update the code > and > > include a version switch. openLilyLib should in general work with all > > versions at least since the latest stable release. > > > > Users should not do any update/convert-ly themselves, they rather > > download or 'git pull' updated versions of the library. > > > > Urs > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lilypond-user mailing list > > lilypond-user@gnu.org <mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > > >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
