Thanks for the replies. I went with forcing and reverting the hshift and that works great. I really appreciate this community.
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 11:03 PM Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > Knute Snortum <ksnortum <at> gmail.com> writes: > > > > > I have a piece that I'm working on that has a measure with four very > crowded voices. I expected to have to resolve note collisions, but I'm > having some problems with \shiftOn and \mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn. > > You don't need mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn because the heads are both filed. > > Two things make merging the inner voices awkward in LilyPond > LilyPond considers merging only the voices the with the smallest \shift. > LilyPond moves voices with larger shifts always toward the stem side. > > The simplest, I think, is to remove the two instances of > \mergeDifferentlyHeadedOn \shiftOn > and set the voices as usual with outer voices One and Two outer, > inner voices Three and Four inner, but 3 overrides > > \new Voice { \voiceOne > \shiftOnn % with 2 'n's to indicate that this voice > % this voice shifts a lot, more than voiceFour, ... > \override NoteColumn.force-hshift = -0.2 % but force the direction > \highVoice } > \new Voice { \voiceThree \upperMiddle > > \new Voice { \voiceFour > \stemUp % unusual for voiceFour > \lowerMiddle } > \new Voice { \voiceTwo \lowVoice > > Maybe the things noted with comments are temporary deviations from the > usual arrangement of voices, so you might insert them in sequence in > the definitions of the variables that contain the notes. > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user