On Sat, 2015-05-30 at 09:46 -0700, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote: > Richard, > > Tried putting the "\clef treble" before the a8.
yes, it is fairly sensitive to minor changes... I think I have found the answer to my other question - the manual says that \shape can take a list of two sets of displacements. \shape #'((0.0 . 0.0) (1 . 1.2) (3 . 1.2) (4 . 1) ()) Slur Richard > Looks good to me, yet I do not know what other constraints you have. > > Mark > > -----Original Message----- > From: lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org > [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr....@gnu.org] On Behalf Of > Richard Shann > Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2015 9:11 AM > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org > Subject: A slur across a line break with change of clef in another staff > generates bad output > > Attached is a bit of LilyPond which has a slur over a line break. At the same > moment the clef is changing in the lower staff. The result is a horribly > broken slur start in the top staff. > I blindly applied the dragging-the-shape on this curve which generated the > commented out offsets. This results in something half-way acceptable. The bug > is sensitive to all sorts of things I think - this was the most I managed to > pare it down - reducing the font size made it go away for example. > > Questions: > Is there special syntax for altering the shapes of the half-slurs at > the end and beginning of the line? > Is this a known bug? > > Richard > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
